RESOURCES FOR YOUNG VICTIMS OF ANTISEMITISM

• In an emergency, always dial 112
• Seek assistance and first aid from emergency services, if
• Write down the details of the incident, including what happened/what was said and the details of the perpetrator. Try to be as specific as possible.
• If it’s safe to do so, collect evidence by taking photos, taking screenshots and approaching potential witnesses, and keeping materials.
• Report the incident as soon as possible to:
  • To the police (for antisemitic criminal acts) -– Antisemitic criminal acts, are criminal acts with an antisemitic bias motive. Criminal acts include vandalism, harassment, assault,
  • To your university or workplace
  • To the social media platform (for online incidents)
  • To organisations monitoring antisemitism (for all antisemitic incidents) (see below)
  • To national equality bodies (for all antisemitic incidents) (see below)
  • To your student union
• Seek counseling and support

Contact EUJS or your national Jewish student We can help you:

Understand your rights;

Provide advice and support with regard to the university, workplace, or institution where the incident took place;

refer you to relevant organisations or materials;

put you in contact with like-minded students or support

• Contact EUJS or your national Jewish student We can help you:
  • Understand your rights;
  • Provide advice and support with regard to the university, workplace, or institution where the incident took place;
  • refer you to relevant organisations or materials;
  • put you in contact with like-minded students or support

• International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), alongside almost every other mainstream Jewish organisation in Europe and across the world.The IHRA working definition has been agreed upon by 31 participating states to the IHRA, and endorsed by the European Parliament, Council and Commission, and almost all EU member States. In addition, the European Students Union (ESU), the European Youth Forum, national and local Student Unions, police departments, political parties, and other bodies rely on the definition. As such, it represents the most widely agreed-upon definition of what constitutes antisemitism existing today globally.The definition (only complete with all of its examples) states, that: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”Attached to the definition is a list of contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g., gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
  • Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
  Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries). Not all expressions of antisemitism care criminal acts. Usually, antisemitism is by itself not illegal – except in certain cases defined by law, such as denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some counties.For example, if a car is vandalised with an antisemitic slur, the vandalism is a criminal, and the antisemitic slur is an aggravating bias motiveCriminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.Antisemitic acts which are not criminal, because they are not defined by law, should still be reported to civil society organizations monitoring antisemitism.

• Report the incident to the dean’s office, ombudsman, or campus
• Many universities have specific mechanisms in place, such as codes of conduct to deal with antisemitic and other discriminatory incidents. If one exists, make sure it is used and implemented correctly, in order to protect your rights on campus.
• Universities will not always be prepared to deal with antisemitism on To formalize their commitment to address antisemitism, acknowledge its multiple manifestations and specify action steps, we promote a model code of conduct developed in partnership with the Romanian inter-ministerial committee on combatting antisemitism, xenophobia, radicalization and incitement to hatred, which can be found here.
• Many universities have structures in place to offer counselling, spiritual and emotional support

‍

• The online space is a particularly fertile ground for antisemitism. It is especially challenging because it provides increased visibility to hate, and exposes – and often radicalises – large numbers of people to anti-Jewish sentiment, often veiled in the form of conspiracy myths.
  • Reporting to the police: In dealing with antisemitism online, it is important to remember that what is illegal offline is illegal online.
  Incitement to hatred and violence, Holocaust denial and distortion in certain countries are criminal acts, whether they manifest offline or online. Thus, if such expressions occur online, you can access the same legal remedies available for physical incidents.
  • Reporting to social media platforms: Reporting hateful and otherwise harmful content to platforms is often frustrating: community standards and criteria for what constitutes removable content is often unclear. Nevertheless, reporting content and accounts is essential in getting social media platforms, forums, and other tech companies to change their policies in the medium and long term.
  • Reporting to civil society organizations and equality bodies: You will find on this page on subsequent tabs, numerous bodies that deal with monitoring and reporting antisemitism. Reporting online incidents is as important as reporting physical incidents and online hatred left unchecked, too often ends up manifesting itself in the physical world.

• Legal protections are in place in all European countries against hatred and discrimination, including antisemitism and guaranteed in the European Convention of Human Rights, and the Charter of Fundamental rights in the European Union.
• Everyone has a right to access justice and to seek redress through an effective remedy on an equal footing, regardless of the kind of discrimination suffered.
• Practically, this means that governments are required to create a safe space for all victims, including victims of crimes based on discrimination, and to protect them from intimidation, retaliation, and secondary victimisation (when a victim suffers harm for a second time because of the manner in which an institution or other individuals deal with the victim).
• In the EU, the two key pieces of legislation are the Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia and The Victims’ Rights Directive.
• The Framework Decision harmonizes rules across the EU so that certain crimes are punished more severely in EU Member States if the perpetrator is motivated by racial or religious prejudice, including antisemitism. This is often referred to as a bias motivator. Similar measures exist in other European countries.
• The Victims’ Rights Directive ensures that all victims of crime have rights, including access to specialist support services and protection measures that correspond to their individual needs related to age, gender, language, and disability.
• This means that when filing a complaint to the police, you have the right to receive all relevant information regarding the case, your rights and access to support services in an accessible language. You also have the right to be understood.

‍

• According to the EU Fundamental Rights Agency, 79 % of victims of antisemitic harassment (and 80% of young people) never reported the most serious incident to the police or any other organisation.Young Jews are more likely to have experienced antisemitic harassment or violence than Jews of other age groups. Almost half (44 %) reported that they were a victim of at least one incident of antisemitic harassment in the last twelve months before the survey, and 4 % report having experienced at least one incident involving antisemitic violence. This means that:
  1. The problem of antisemitism in Europe is probably a lot bigger than the data shows.
  2. Young Jews are the most likely to be a victim of antisemitism and the least likely to report.
  3. Victims think that reporting an incident is bureaucratic and time-consuming, and that it will likely not make a difference.
  4. Victims do not think that authorities will understand their concerns and take appropriate actions.
  This perception is often correct. According to the EU Strategy on combating antisemitism and fostering Jewish life, support structures for victims of antisemitic incidents across Europe are often inadequate.However, if we do not report, nothing is going to change. The problem of antisemitism on Europe’s streets, on campus, or online, will continue to be underestimated and misunderstood by the authorities. By reporting incidents, we make a small contribution that can change the big picture.

• Austria – Reporting Centre for Antisemitism (IKG Wien)
• Belgium – Antisemitisme.be
• Czech Rep. – Federation of Jewish Communities in the Czech Rep. (FZO)
• Denmark – AKVAH – Reporting point for antisemitic incidents
• France – Service for the Protection of the Jewish Community (SPCJ)
• Germany – Federal Association of Departments for Research and Information on Antisemitism (RIAS)
• Italy – Antisemitism Observatory
• Netherlands – Information and Documentation Center Israel (CIDI)
• Norway – Jewish community of Norway
• Spain – Antisemitism Observatory(FCJE)
• Switzerland – Swiss Federation of Jewish Communities (SIG/FCSI)
• United Kingdom – Community Security Trust (CST)
• Across Europe – Security and Crisis Center by the European Jewish Congress (SACC by EJC)

• Most European countries have national equality bodies in place. The activities they carry out are different from country to country, such as compiling reports of incidents, raising awareness, offering resources to take action, or providing legal advice or assistance. In some countries they can even adopt legally binding decisions on discrimination.
• Austria             Ombud for Equal Treatment
• Belgium           Inter-federal Center for Equal Opportunities (UNIA)
• Bosnia and Herzegovina The Institution of Human Rights Ombudsman of Bosnia and Herzegovina
• Bulgaria           Commission for Protection against Discrimination
• Croatia            Ombudsman of the Republic of Croatia
• Cyprus             Commissioner for Administration and the Protection of Human Rights
• Czech Rep.       Public Defender of Rights
• Denmark         Danish Institute for Human Rights
• Estonia            Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner
• Finland            Non-Discrimination Ombudsman
• France             Inter-ministerial Delegation on the fight against racism, antisemitism and LGBT- hatred
• Defender of Rights
• Germany         Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency
• Greece             Greek Ombudsman
• Hungary           Office of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights
• Ireland             Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission
• Italy                 National Office against Racial Discrimination
• Latvia               Ombudsman’s Office of the Republic of Latvia
• Lithuania         Office of the Equal Opportunities Ombudsperson
• Luxembourg    Centre for Equal Treatment
• Malta               National Commission for the Promotion of Equality
• Netherlands    Institute for Human Rights
• Macedonia Commission for Prevention and Protection against Discrimination
• Norway           The Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombud
• Poland             Commissioner for Human Rights
• Portugal           Commission for Citizenship and Gender Equality
• Romania          National Council for Combating Discrimination
• Serbia              Commissioner for the Protection of Equality
• Slovakia           Slovak National Centre for Human Rights
• Slovenia           The Advocate of the Principle of Equality Slovenia
• Spain               Council for the Elimination of Racial or Ethnic Discrimination
• Sweden           The Equality Ombudsman
• United Kingdom Equality and Human Rights Commission
• ‍

• Austria – Civil Courage and anti-racism support (ZARA)
• Czech Rep. – In Iustitia
• France – International League Against Racism and Antisemitism (LICRA)
• Germany – Counselling Centre for antisemitic violence and discrimination (OFEK)
• Germany – Association of Counselling Centers for right-wing, racist and antisemitic violence (VBRG)
• Spain – Movement Against Intolerance (MCI)
• United Kingdom – Community Security Trust

• • Share your story to empower others
  • Be there for others by joining or creating support groups
  • Encourage others to report
  • If you see something, say something

• • EUJS – How to support your Jewish students Guide
  • CST and UJS – The Students’ Guide to antisemitism
  • EU Fundamental Rights Agency - Overview of antisemitic incidents recorded in the EU 2011-2021
  • EU Fundamental Rights Agency – Young Jewish Europeans: Perceptions and experiences of antisemitism
  • EU Fundamental Rights Agency – Second Survey on discrimination and hate crime against Jews in the EU
  • EU Strategy on combating antisemitism and fostering Jewish life
  • EU Victims’ Rights Directive
  • European Commission – Legal policy and framework on victims’ rights
  • EU Council Framework Decision on combating racism and xenophobia
  • International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance – IHRA working definition of antisemitism
  • B’nai B’rith International and ISD – Online Antisemitism: A toolkit for civil society
  • CEJI - Facing Facts
  • OSCE – ODIHR – Enhancing hate crime victim support
  • • Networks Overcoming Antisemitism